Moral judgment and the content-attitude distinction
نویسندگان
چکیده
Let cognitivism be the view that moral judgments are cognitive mental states and noncognitivism they noncognitive states. Here I argue for judgment pluralism: some More specifically, according to my pluralism because carry a content (e.g., genocide is wrong) employ attitude indignation, or guilt); former latter ones. After explaining motivating view, this kind of handles quite elegantly several core issues have structured debate on versus noncognitivism.
منابع مشابه
Time and moral judgment.
Do moral judgments hinge on the time available to render them? According to a recent dual-process model of moral judgment, moral dilemmas that engage emotional processes are likely to result in fast deontological gut reactions. In contrast, consequentialist responses that tot up lives saved and lost in response to such dilemmas would require cognitive control to override the initial response. C...
متن کاملEmotion and moral judgment.
Research in psychology and cognitive science has consistently demonstrated the importance of emotion in a wide range of everyday judgments, including moral judgment. Most current accounts of moral judgment hold that emotion plays an important role, but the nature and extent of this role are still debated. We outline three increasingly strong claims about the role of emotion in moral judgment an...
متن کاملMoral/conventional Distinction
In an experimental critique of the moral/conventional (M/C) distinction, Kelly et al. (2007) present new experimental data about responses to transgressions involving harm, where the novelty is that transgressors are grown-ups, rather than children. Their data do not support the moral/conventional distinction. The contrast between grown-up and schoolyard transgressions does not seem, however, t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophical Studies
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1573-0883', '0031-8116']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01690-5